Monday, 26 May 2008

Eurovision 2008

An event which once used to unite Europe now seems to divide it.
 
A few days ago we could all see another spectacular final of the Eurovision Song Contest and as it usually happens after the show, there were voices of disappointment, outrage and complaint. There are some who say the winning song didn’t deserve to win and that it happened only because of the, so called, ‘neighbourly voting’. It must be true to a certain extent as most of the highest points were given to Russia by its neighbour countries which long ago created the USSR. But giving points to neighbouring countries has been part of Eurovision for a very long time: Cyprus and Greece almost always exchanging douze points, the Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Iceland) voting for one another and Ireland and the UK doing the same. It can be said, that this kind of behaviour has been almost an icon of the contest and people treated it indulgently. The situation has, however, changed as more and more Eastern European countries started joining. Last year’s winner, Serbia, won the contest because of, as many claim, votes from countries of former Yugoslavia which had voted for the song. And again, this is only partly true, for even if only Western Europeans had been allowed to cast their vote, Serbia would have still won. This year’s winner, Dima Bilan from Russia, came first due to the high number of votes from Russia’s neighbours but also from other countries without a big Russian diaspora.
Maybe Eurovision has become too much about politics and too little about music, but on the other hand, the example of Finland shows that when there is a strong favourite in Europe, even politics won’t stop it from winning. And I’m afraid this year there was none and political voting might have determined the winner.
What saddens me most is that there were many good songs which weren’t lucky enough to go through the semi finals or which finished up outside the top ten.
My favourites included (in no particular order):
Portugal – Senhora do Mar
Romania - Pe-o Margine De Lume
Serbia - Oro
Israel – Ke'ilo kan
San Marino – Complice
Switzerland – Era Stupendo
The last two (both sung in Italian) were never to appear in the final.
In my opinion, the two entries which shared the last place (Poland and the UK) didn't deserve it at all. Those positions should have been taken by France and Spain as songs from these two 'great' contestants were an utter disgrace.
 
Let’s hope that the EBU will come up with a solution to the supposed problem of political/block voting before other countries start fallowing Austria’s steps and withdraw from the contest.
For now, all what’s left is to congratulate Russia their victory and to hope that next year we will see another wonderful show which the rest of the world can only envy us :-)

6 comments:

Greg said...

Did I spell a word wrong on my blog Zarazek? Oooops....so sorry. Perhaps a Liberal like you should study a bit more before you speak! Care to opine? Study up boy!

Greg
26 May

zarazek said...

At least a liberal like me doesn't make as many and as basic spelling mistakes as conservatives like you.
Big patriot and doesn't care about the orthography of his own (inherited from the British, by the way) language.
Shame on you.
27 May

Greg said...

I see that you visited my site again Zarazek. Good for you. I rebutted your comment because my spelling in that blog is correct. I suppose that is why you did not leave another comment. I admit that my spelling is not the best and I try to keep mistakes at a minimum. However, I must quote you when you wrote this,...(see above)

Quote (Let’s hope that the EBU will come up with a solution to the supposed problem of political/block voting before other countries start fallowing Austria’s steps and withdraw from the contest.)

Fallowing? Here in the USA, we spell that word as "following". Maybe you Scot's spell it like you do. I really do not care. I do care when a young misguided liberal tries to make me look bad. You want a fight, you got one. Your turn. Leave a comment on my site the next time you visit instead of running away again. You can do us both a favor and just delete this comment and not visit my site again. This way you will look like a hero to your liberal visitors, and I won't have to respond to Loonies like you.

Shame on me?




28 May

zarazek said...

Yes, you're right, my bad. But hey, I just spelt one word incorrectly. Are you happy to correct someone who couldn't speak a word of English until he was 17? I don't have to be ashamed, you, on the other hand, as a great american patriot, by all means should.
Here's a hint for you: there's no need for an apostrophe in nouns in plural - Scots, NOT Scot's, americans, not american's.
The same for verbs in 3rd person singular: He says, she goes, it grows. Hope that helped.
Don't worry, I don't want any wars with americans, cos that's the Arabs' job.
30 May

Greg said...

No....wrong again Zarazek. It is "My Bad", not "I my Bad". As a great American I do not care how my message is recieved , as long as it is understood. You still do not understand. You are a liberal. You will never understand this as long as you listen to the media.

You seem like a very smart young man. That said, always listen to both sides of the table, then draw your own conclusions.

I do not care about spelling as long as my point is taken. Yes, you are correct. My spelling needs some help. You should become a high school teacher here in the USA, teaching the English language. I think you could be a giant in this field.

That said, you wrote:

Don't worry, I don't want any wars with americans, cos that's the Arabs' job

Dooood, really. Wake up man.









30 May

zarazek said...

As you can see, I had corrected it before you posted your comment (it was late and English is not my native language, hence the mistake and many others). But I still believe that as a patriot, one should cherish one's native language as it's part of the culture and the nation's heritage. But as a liberal, I will say: it's up to you. And of course I do understand your point of view, however, that doesn't mean I have to agree with it.
I don't deny that my sociopolitical views have been influenced by the media, but I also have my own brain and can come to the right conlusions. Besides, I'm not THAT liberal as you might think I am (although probaby still a hundred times more so than you are). I don't know how well the americans can speak English, but I doubt they would learn much from me.
30 May